Breasts: sex objects or the natural way to feed your baby? After reading a friend's
blog post about post-nursing breasts, I thought of the contrast between what breasts were designed to do (i.e., nursing babies) and breasts as exhibited in celebratory fashion.
At this point, I'll let guys, looking for something more salacious, to click the back button and return to their search page.Ok, back to my post.
Now, not only have necklines plunged to mere inches above the nipple, but we see some celebrity dresses feature a mere two vertical sashes leaving ample side cleavage, and little to the imagination.
With so much revealed, you can almost guarantee every celebrity needs medical enhancing to get that perfect shape and size.
Clearly, in American culture the breast has become a sex object, maybe even the first thing a guy looks at. (But I won't say anything disparaging about men; they're intoxicated with testosterone and can’t help it if society has defined breasts as something to become aroused at mere sight of one.)
But let's contrast this with Muslim culture where women are covered head to toe. No wonder the culture war between Islam and the West!
Also contrast that with a more conservative time in the US (‘50s, early 60’s) when breasts were out of sight, out of mind, and
served no function. The modern woman of that time chose the “modern” way to feed her baby with delicious, “nutritious” formula!
Hmmm, do you think that once breasts stopped serving their biological function, they became sexual?
Finally, consider some societies in the warmer climates of Africa and southeast Asia where women may go around topless. In these societies, this is simply natural, and breast do not take on a sexual nature. No customers for enhancement there!
Now I don't mean to be prudish about breasts, but I do think our celebrity culture has taken breasts to an extreme!